Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, Ventura County Planning Commissin

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, Ventura County Planning Commissin
Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, Ziyka, Ventura County Planning Commission
Showing posts with label nora aidukas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nora aidukas. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Appeal hearing before the Board of Supervisors today

We will be posting video from the appeal hearing today at the Board of Supervisors as soon as it is available.

Before the meeting started the lobbyist most likely paid by Lisa Siderman named Cheline Lundin put stickers on 2/3 of the chairs in the room. This caused there not to be enough room for Isis Preservation supporters to fit in the room. Some sat outside in the lobby and viewed the meeting on the tv screens.

Before the meeting an elderly woman with white hair came over to the supporters side and said "No tigers! No Russians!!!" directly in the face of Irena, Sophia and their lawyers. This same person whom I will name when I am 100% positive of her name then confronted a supporter physically. Security had to repeatedly warn this old white hair woman to control herself or she would be ejected and could be jailed. Before the hearing in the lobby these people stated that "someone should pick them off with a sharp shooter," "these people will never be our neighbor." During the meeting they stated that people might "cut open the cages and free the tigers."

At a previous hearing Planning Commissioner stated she would be able to see the roof of the enclosure from the Serrano horse trail. This was a bold face lie. There is no place on the trail where one could see the roof. Today Lisa Siderman showed photos stating you could see the side of the house from 1.2 miles away and below the structure. This proves Commissioner Nora Audukis lied when she stated she'd be able to see the roof. The side of the house will always be visible no matter if there are enclosures or not. The Hausers offered to put camoflague netting and add more trees need be.

Many other similar and very disgusting things happened before the hearing and afterward. These included falsified emails, defamation, libel, slander, threats to children and much much more.

One interesting thing came up today. It turns out Irena is an aerospace engineer who graduated from UCLA cum laude. She worked on the docking mechanism of the Space Shuttle. More tomorrow.

We do not know the plans of Isis Preservation at this time. We do know that one must appeal a Planning Commission decision to the Board of Supervisors. The BOP are voted in. They are not appointed. Therefore the BOP would want to do what what most people in Ventura county who can vote want to do. The case cannot be appealed to the State level until after it's appealed and denied by the BOP.

One last interesting thing was that the eight year old son of a supporter noted today that the detractor's logo is in fact a double negative. This means their logo actually means "yes, tigers."

Malibu, white, tigers, irena hauser, sophia, 
Ventura County Star article about the meeting
http://www.vcstar.com/news/2014/jun/10/live-updates-supervisors-hear-tigers-appeal/

Isis Preservation website
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu YouTube channel
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu blog
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu Twitter

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, conditional use permit, cup, Ventura County Planning Department, Commission, hearing, tiger, sanctuary, malibu, 11077 pacific view, california, negative declaration, commissioner, michael wesner, stephen onstot, board of supervisors, ventura.org, isispreservation.com, tigersanctuarymalibu, paul magie, nora aidukas, richard rodriguez, w. stephen onstot, steve bennett, linda parks, kathy long, peter foy, john zaragoza, peter c foy, john c zaragoza, zoning, planning, public comment, lawsuit, sophia krszek, white tiger, russian, usda 93-c-0762, tujunga, fish, wildlife, permit, license, PL13-0011, exhibit, television, movies, film, trainer, experienced



Sunday, June 1, 2014

Carlos Siderman, Property ID sued for false advertising, defamation, unfair trade practices - Deer Creek Ranch Malibu

Property I.D. Sued for False Advertising, Defamation and Unfair Trade Practices. During the course of the investigations and lawsuits it is revealed that Carlos Siderman lied when he stated Property ID was formed in 1974 when it was actually formed in 1994. It was also revealed that Carlos Siderman who did not even graduate from college had been representing himself to others as a lawyer. According to sworn declarations by his son and ex-wife, it was stated that Carlos Siderman forged a fake certificate of graduation which he place on his office wall.

Thu Jan 17, 2008

 Property I.D. Also Facing Charges of Malicious Prosecution Following Dismissal
of Lawsuits Against Former Employees

    SANTA MONICA, Calif., Jan. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- National Disclosure
Authority (NDA), an independent hazard disclosure company, has announced that
it has filed a lawsuit ("NDA, et al, v. Property I.D., et al") against
Property I.D. (PID) for anticompetitive activities.
    The Lawsuit against PID cites a number of unlawful anticompetitive activities
engaged in by PID in the marketplace. The lawsuit includes claims for unfair
and unlawful competition, trade libel, misappropriation of trade secrets,
conversion, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and
false advertising of its products, services, and claims regarding PID's
insurance coverage. For example, the lawsuit states that PID has falsely
advertised that each of its reports is a "$20,000,000 Insured Product."
    "Throughout the proceedings, PID vigorously resisted any disclosure of its
insurance policies," said Ronald Arena, Esq., attorney for NDA. "We are
encouraged in our suit by the fact that PID has not claimed that its insurance
representations from 2002 to 2007 were true," he added. The Court recently
denied PID's motion to prevent the disclosure of its insurance policies, and
demanded that it make its insurance brokers available for deposition. The
Court also recently denied PID's attempt to have the case against it
dismissed.
    "NDA has amassed an abundance of information regarding the anticompetitive
acts engaged in by PID," said Arena. "Moreover, we believe that NDA will
prevail on its claims against Property ID."
    "Property I.D. is attempting to distract their clients from the real
issue -- their false insurance representations -- by using mud-slinging
tactics and hoping to focus attention elsewhere. No matter how many false
claims and personal attacks they make against their competitors, they cannot
escape the fact that they lied to their clients, and continue to do so," said
Sergio Siderman, founder and president of NDA.
    Litigation Against Property I.D.
    In early 2007, the majority of PID's management team left the Company when
they discovered a number of misrepresentations being made by PID to its
clients, including, but not limited to: the discovery that PID was only
carrying half the amount of insurance it was advertising; that company owner
Carlos Siderman falsely claimed to being an attorney while conducting legal
presentations; and that the Company was actually formed in 1994, nearly two
decades later than PID advertised.
    Property I.D. filed lawsuits against many of its former employees who left
the company in 2007, in an attempt to harass and intimidate them from joining
NDA. Most of PID's lawsuits have already been dismissed.
    In an unusual turn of events, reports have come in that PID has begun
harassing and threatening lawsuits against real estate brokerages who choose
to move away from PID and towards competitors. "If their desired result is to
push business our way, it's working," said Genaro Trejo, Vice President and
CFO for NDA.
    In the last 24 months, PID has been sued by the U.S. Dept. of Justice for
violating anti-kickback statutes (Secretary of U.S. Dept. of Housing v.
Property I.D., et al.); by consumers in a Federal Class Action (Berger v.
Property I.D.); by Realogy Corp. in a federal case for multiple breaches of
contract (Realogy v. Property I.D.); by Coldwell Banker for sending its agents
unsolicited reports and invoices (Coldwell Banker v. Property I.D.); by Nutmeg
Insurance Company for declaratory relief (Nutmeg v. Property I.D.); and by a
real estate agent for PID's inaccurate flood determination on her property
(Blasko v. Kirk, et al).
    Copies of any of the lawsuits filed against Property I.D. by the U.S.
Department of Justice, Class Action plaintiffs, Realogy, Coldwell Banker, or
NDA, can be obtained at http://www.ndareports.com/legal-info.html
SOURCE  National Disclosure Authority

Maria Cordova of National Disclosure Authority, 1-866-918-1966

Isis Preservation website
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu YouTube channel
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu blog
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu Twitter

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, conditional use permit, cup, Ventura County Planning Department, Commission, hearing, tiger, sanctuary, malibu, 11077 pacific view, california, negative declaration, commissioner, michael wesner, stephen onstot, board of supervisors, ventura.org, isispreservation.com, tigersanctuarymalibu, paul magie, nora aidukas, richard rodriguez, w. stephen onstot, steve bennett, linda parks, kathy long, peter foy, john zaragoza, peter c foy, john c zaragoza, zoning, planning, public comment, lawsuit, sophia krszek, white tiger, russian, usda 93-c-0762, tujunga, fish, wildlife, permit, license, PL13-0011, exhibit, television, movies, film, trainer, experienced



Complaints filed by multiple people against Carlos Siderman at 10999 Pacific View for illegal business, destroying oaks, bulldozing creek, illegal signs

Through the results of state information requests we have gotten a hold of complaints and lawsuits against Carlos Siderman. Carlos Siderman is behind the drive to harass the Hausers off their land so Siderman may buy the property. Carlos Siderman wants to ride his horses from his property into the state park land off trail. The only thing in his way is 11077 Pacific View. Below data taken from public reports.

1. The owner of the property lists the address as 10999 Pacific View but it is legally 10995 Pacific View. It is next door to 11077 Pacific View. Attached please find copies of their websites, Facebook ages, corporation information, photos which prove that they have run this business since 2005. No one lives on the property. The corporation number is C3480158 and was formed 06/14/2012. See attached. They take clients on their horses on their property to the Serrano Rd trail. There is a lot of traffic on the weekends with many cars. They built a parking lot but don't have handicap parking. Their trucks have the name of their business written on them with their logo.

2. Attached please find photos of the grading, dirt removal, brush removal and oak tree cutting. Someone already sent in a complaint late 2013 (CV13-0505) about this which Manny Ramos is investigating. Previously there was a lawsuit concerning this creek and property. See attached. It was determined by the courts to be a protected creek with protect dirt, shrubs and oak trees. The court stated that no one may touch or pass over the creek. I inspected and photographed this March 15, 2014. There are hoof prints going from 10995 Pacific View over 11077 Pacific View and into the California state park. The people at 11077 Pacific View do not own any horses. Currently Bing, Google and Mapquest satellite images show the before photo of the creek. This was done in late 2013.

3. Attached please find photos of the illegal signs which I took March 20, 2014. They are 4' x 8' and 6' x 10' permanent wooden signs that are free standing or attached to walls and gates. Two large signs are attached to the front of 10995 Pacific View. They can be seen when driving to 11077 Pacific View. They have been there for many months and were featured in newspapers and all over the internet. They have no permit, the signs are unsafe, they have no zoning variance to place these signs. This is coastal scenic land. The signs are an eyesore. Some are on the public street.

Full complaint is 5 MB.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6QQek7gVUpydDF3YmRpNHBiaUE/edit?usp=sharing

Carlos Siderman of Deer Creek Ranch Malibu riding off trail in the Santa Monica mountains in a coastal zone after the fires

Carlos Siderman of Deer Creek Ranch Malibu bulldozed a protected creek, protected oak trees, shrubs in the coastal zone of the Santa Monica mountain. The road is 15' wide, 10' deep and a 1/2 a mile long leading into the Santa Monica mountains. He built this to use as a horse trail so he can take clients for rides. He runs an illegal business out of the property. He does not live at this property. It's in a residential zone.

Carlos Siderman of Deer Creek Ranch Malibu bulldozed a protected creek, protected oak trees, shrubs in the coastal zone of the Santa Monica mountain. The road is 15' wide, 10' deep and a 1/2 a mile long leading into the Santa Monica mountains. He built this to use as a horse trail so he can take clients for rides. He runs an illegal business out of the property. He does not live at this property. It's in a residential zone.

Carlos Siderman runs an illegal business from a residential property. He would need a conditional use permit to run a business on this property. His neighbors would never allow it. Deer Creek Ranch Malibu, 
December of 2013 someone else made another complaint about Carlos Siderman bulldozing a protected creek, oak trees, shrubs in coastal zone of Santa Monica mountains. He is also running and illegal business from the site.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6QQek7gVUpyVl84ZlhnRWVrSkE/edit?usp=sharing

Carlos Siderman, Property ID, complaint, Deer Creek Ranch Malibu, illegal business, creek, oak trees destroyed



Isis Preservation website
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu YouTube channel
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu blog
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu Twitter

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, conditional use permit, cup, Ventura County Planning Department, Commission, hearing, tiger, sanctuary, malibu, 11077 pacific view, california, negative declaration, commissioner, michael wesner, stephen onstot, board of supervisors, ventura.org, isispreservation.com, tigersanctuarymalibu, paul magie, nora aidukas, richard rodriguez, w. stephen onstot, steve bennett, linda parks, kathy long, peter foy, john zaragoza, peter c foy, john c zaragoza, zoning, planning, public comment, lawsuit, sophia krszek, white tiger, russian, usda 93-c-0762, tujunga, fish, wildlife, permit, license, PL13-0011, exhibit, television, movies, film, trainer, experienced



Sunday, March 23, 2014

Attorney Charles Coate speaks for Isis Preservation CUP

Attorney Charles Coate speaks for Isis Preservation CUP.


Attorney Charles Coate speaks for the conditional use permit for Isis Preservation. Ventura County Planning Commission hearing March 20, 2014. PL13-0011 Irena Hauser of Isis Preservation. Lisa and Carlos Siderman are sitting aboveand to the right of Mr Coate wearing green hats. Carlos is wearing a black vest.

Lisa Davies Siderman, Carlos Siderman
Mr Coate mentions cell phone repeaters. The Hausers will be installing the very small personal cell phone repeaters, not a large antennae. They do not need a CUP to install small personal repeaters. The repeater looks like this photo below. 

Small cell phone repeater about 6" x 6" x 1/2".
People in this area have land lines and cell phones. They don't rely on cell phones alone. That said if a person does not get a reverse 911 voice call on their cell phone, they will see it in their voice mail. They can see it's from 911. I suggest they have a text option as texts take up less bandwidth and are easier to send/receive in spotty cellular areas.

We believe Commissioner Nora Aidukas was being unprofessional, rude and violated the Brown Act by not allowing attorney Charles Coate to ask Irena Hauser what type of repeater she intended to install. Again, Commissioner Nora Aidukas has a conflict of interest in this case. Her husband James Aidukas runs JTA Associates which is a professional consulting firm specializing in project design, permitting and implementation.  James Aidukas works for Carlos Siderman the neighbor who opposes this CUP for personal reasons. Nora Aidukas should have disclaimed this before the March 20, 2014 meeting but did not. We feel Nora Aidukas should have recused herself from this item because of the conflict of interest. We also feel that Nora Aidukas should not be on the planning commission as her husband's main job is to get real estate projects approved by the planning commission. This is a clear conflict of interest.

Isis Preservation website
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu YouTube channel
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu blog
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu Twitter

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, conditional use permit, cup, Ventura County Planning Department, Commission, hearing, tiger, sanctuary, malibu, 11077 pacific view, california, negative declaration, commissioner, michael wesner, stephen onstot, board of supervisors, ventura.org, isispreservation.com, tigersanctuarymalibu, paul magie, nora aidukas, richard rodriguez, w. stephen onstot, steve bennett, linda parks, kathy long, peter foy, john zaragoza, peter c foy, john c zaragoza, zoning, planning, public comment, lawsuit, sophia krszek, white tiger, russian, usda 93-c-0762, tujunga, fish, wildlife, permit, license, PL13-0011, exhibit, television, movies, film, trainer, experienced