Lawsuits against Carlos Siderman, Property ID - Deer Creek Ranch Malibu

Through the course of litigation it is discovered that Carlos Siderman has been lying about when Property ID first originated. Carlos Siderman claimed he started it in 1974. He actually started it with a partner in 1995 over two decades later. That partner is later revealed to have been a suspected drug lord. If the DEA and LAPD knew his partner was a drug lord, I would assume Carlos Siderman knew as well.

Carlos Siderman, Property ID sued by his son Sergio Siderman for unfair and unlawful competition, defamation per se, trade libel, misappropriation of trade secrets, malicious prosecution, conversion, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, false advertising.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6QQek7gVUpyb3NveFFiTEtlb1k/edit?usp=sharing

Carlos Siderman, Property ID, Deer Creek Ranch Malibu, lawsuit, false advertising, defamation

Mirta Siderman Carlos Siderman's ex-wife writes a declaration against Carlos Siderman. In her declaration she states Carlos Siderman did not start Property ID in 1974 but in 1994. Corporation documents show it was started in 1995. Mirta Siderman states she was married to Carlos Sider from 1971 to 1994. He was involved in construction and steel doors before 1994. Carlos Siderman did not even arrive in the US until 1976. 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6QQek7gVUpyNXZzdnZMZGppZlU/edit?usp=sharing

Carlos Siderman, Property ID, Deer Creek Ranch Malibu, lawsuit, false advertising, defamation

In this same statement Carlos Siderman's son Sergio Siderman makes a statement. Sergio Siderman states he worked at Property ID with his father Carlos Siderman from 1993 to 2007. I believe he meant 1994. Carlos Siderman fired his son when his son questioned certain business transactions and policies. After Carlos fired his son he defamed him. Sergio started his new business and Carlos tried to destroy it by defaming Sergio. Carlos went so far and so low to send a defamatory flyer about Sergio's business to his clients. Sergio claims that Property ID made no profits in 2006 and 2007.

Sergio Siderman stated that Carlos Siderman lied when he said he is a lawyer. In actuality Carlos Siderman does not have a college or law degree. He most certainly never passed the bar. Sergio Siderman states that Carlos Siderman forged a law degree and hung it on his wall. Carlos Siderman for many years at many public business events held himself out to be an attorney but he is not.

Carlos Siderman, Property ID, not an attorney, no college degree

Carlos Siderman hired an attorney to find plaintiffs to file a frivolous and meritless class action lawsuits against all his competitors. That lawsuit was dismissed as frivolous but unfortunately all the competitors were forced out of business by the false charges. Carlos Siderman also falsely claimed they were the oldest property disclosure business. That is totally untrue.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6QQek7gVUpyNDlJQU9zSVdpVk0/edit?usp=sharing

Carlos Siderman, Property ID, lawsuit, Sergio Siderman, hazard, insurance, fraud, false advertising

When it was revealed that Property ID was started in 1994 and not 1976, Carlos Siderman corrected the falsity in Property ID's website. Very recently he has changed the origination date back to 1976. Below is an image of the page from today.

Carlos Siderman, Property ID lies about origination date. It is not 1976 but 1994.

Below is a copy of the true corporation ID number and origination date. Property ID was formed in 1994 not 1976.

Carlos Siderman, Property ID 1994 not 1976

More lawsuits

Civil Results
	Party Name	Court	Case	NOS	Date Filed	Date Closed
1	Siderman, Carlos (cd)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-03154	790	05/14/2007	07/09/2007
2	Siderman, Carlos (cd)	cacdce	2:2008-cv-00696	110	02/01/2008	02/10/2009
3	Siderman, Carlos (pla)	cacdce	2:1982-cv-01772	890	04/12/1982	09/13/1996
4	Siderman, Carlos (pla)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-01028	190	02/14/2007	02/21/2012
5	Siderman, Carlos (pla)	cacdce	2:2008-cv-00696	110	02/01/2008	02/10/2009
6	Siderman, Carlos A. (dft)	gandce	1:1987-cv-01698	190	07/29/1987	07/20/1988

Appellate Results
	Party Name	Court	Case	NOS	Date Filed	Date Closed
7	Siderman, Carlos (pty)	09cae	93-15819	0	05/06/1993	02/11/1994
8	Siderman, Carlos (pty)	09cae	95-55506	3890	04/14/1995	07/20/1995
9	Siderman, Carlos (pty)	09cae	09-55364	4110	03/12/2009	04/26/2010

Even more lawsuits against Property ID

Civil Results
	Party Name	Court	Case	NOS	Date Filed	Date Closed
1	Property ID Affiliates 1 LLC (dft)	cacdce	2:2005-cv-05373	890	07/25/2005	01/28/2009
2	Property ID Affiliates LLC (dft)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-00288	110	01/11/2007	10/18/2007
3	Property ID Associates LLC (dft)	cacdce	2:2005-cv-05373	890	07/25/2005	01/28/2009
4	Property ID Associates LLC (dft)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-00288	110	01/11/2007	10/18/2007
5	Property ID California LLC (dft)	cacdce	2:2005-cv-05373	890	07/25/2005	01/28/2009
6	Property ID California LLC (dft)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-00288	110	01/11/2007	10/18/2007
7	Property ID Corporation (cd)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-01028	190	02/14/2007	02/21/2012
8	Property ID Corporation (cd)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-03154	790	05/14/2007	07/09/2007
9	Property ID Corporation (dft)	cacdce	2:2005-cv-05373	890	07/25/2005	01/28/2009
10	Property ID Corporation (dft)	cacdce	2:2006-cv-05627	190	09/07/2006	03/01/2007
11	Property ID Corporation (dft)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-00288	110	01/11/2007	10/18/2007
12	Property ID Corporation (pla)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-01028	190	02/14/2007	02/21/2012
13	Property ID Corporation (pla)	cacdce	2:2007-cv-03154	790	05/14/2007	07/09/2007
14	Property ID of California Inc (dft)	cacdce	2:2005-cv-05373	890	07/25/2005	01/28/2009

and more

Appellate Results
	Party Name	Court	Case	NOS	Date Filed	Date Closed
117	Property ID Affiliates 1, LLC (pty)	09cae	09-55278	3890	02/25/2009	06/23/2009
118	Property ID Associates, LLC (pty)	09cae	09-55278	3890	02/25/2009	06/23/2009
119	Property ID California, LLC (pty)	09cae	09-55278	3890	02/25/2009	06/23/2009
120	Property ID Corporation (pty)	09cae	09-55278	3890	02/25/2009	06/23/2009
121	Property ID of California, Inc. (pty)	09cae	09-55278	3890	02/25/2009	06/23/2009

Isis Preservation website
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu YouTube channel
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu blog
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu Twitter

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, conditional use permit, cup, Ventura County Planning Department, Commission, hearing, tiger, sanctuary, malibu, 11077 pacific view, california, negative declaration, commissioner, michael wesner, stephen onstot, board of supervisors, ventura.org, isispreservation.com, tigersanctuarymalibu, paul magie, nora aidukas, richard rodriguez, w. stephen onstot, steve bennett, linda parks, kathy long, peter foy, john zaragoza, peter c foy, john c zaragoza, zoning, planning, public comment, lawsuit, sophia krszek, white tiger, russian, usda 93-c-0762, tujunga, fish, wildlife, permit, license, PL13-0011, exhibit, television, movies, film, trainer, experienced

Carlos Siderman, Property ID sued for false advertising, defamation, unfair trade practices - Deer Creek Ranch Malibu

Property I.D. Sued for False Advertising, Defamation and Unfair Trade Practices. During the course of the investigations and lawsuits it is revealed that Carlos Siderman lied when he stated Property ID was formed in 1974 when it was actually formed in 1994. It was also revealed that Carlos Siderman who did not even graduate from college had been representing himself to others as a lawyer. According to sworn declarations by his son and ex-wife, it was stated that Carlos Siderman forged a fake certificate of graduation which he place on his office wall.

Thu Jan 17, 2008

 Property I.D. Also Facing Charges of Malicious Prosecution Following Dismissal
of Lawsuits Against Former Employees

    SANTA MONICA, Calif., Jan. 17 /PRNewswire/ -- National Disclosure
Authority (NDA), an independent hazard disclosure company, has announced that
it has filed a lawsuit ("NDA, et al, v. Property I.D., et al") against
Property I.D. (PID) for anticompetitive activities.
    The Lawsuit against PID cites a number of unlawful anticompetitive activities
engaged in by PID in the marketplace. The lawsuit includes claims for unfair
and unlawful competition, trade libel, misappropriation of trade secrets,
conversion, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, and
false advertising of its products, services, and claims regarding PID's
insurance coverage. For example, the lawsuit states that PID has falsely
advertised that each of its reports is a "$20,000,000 Insured Product."
    "Throughout the proceedings, PID vigorously resisted any disclosure of its
insurance policies," said Ronald Arena, Esq., attorney for NDA. "We are
encouraged in our suit by the fact that PID has not claimed that its insurance
representations from 2002 to 2007 were true," he added. The Court recently
denied PID's motion to prevent the disclosure of its insurance policies, and
demanded that it make its insurance brokers available for deposition. The
Court also recently denied PID's attempt to have the case against it
dismissed.
    "NDA has amassed an abundance of information regarding the anticompetitive
acts engaged in by PID," said Arena. "Moreover, we believe that NDA will
prevail on its claims against Property ID."
    "Property I.D. is attempting to distract their clients from the real
issue -- their false insurance representations -- by using mud-slinging
tactics and hoping to focus attention elsewhere. No matter how many false
claims and personal attacks they make against their competitors, they cannot
escape the fact that they lied to their clients, and continue to do so," said
Sergio Siderman, founder and president of NDA.
    Litigation Against Property I.D.
    In early 2007, the majority of PID's management team left the Company when
they discovered a number of misrepresentations being made by PID to its
clients, including, but not limited to: the discovery that PID was only
carrying half the amount of insurance it was advertising; that company owner
Carlos Siderman falsely claimed to being an attorney while conducting legal
presentations; and that the Company was actually formed in 1994, nearly two
decades later than PID advertised.
    Property I.D. filed lawsuits against many of its former employees who left
the company in 2007, in an attempt to harass and intimidate them from joining
NDA. Most of PID's lawsuits have already been dismissed.
    In an unusual turn of events, reports have come in that PID has begun
harassing and threatening lawsuits against real estate brokerages who choose
to move away from PID and towards competitors. "If their desired result is to
push business our way, it's working," said Genaro Trejo, Vice President and
CFO for NDA.
    In the last 24 months, PID has been sued by the U.S. Dept. of Justice for
violating anti-kickback statutes (Secretary of U.S. Dept. of Housing v.
Property I.D., et al.); by consumers in a Federal Class Action (Berger v.
Property I.D.); by Realogy Corp. in a federal case for multiple breaches of
contract (Realogy v. Property I.D.); by Coldwell Banker for sending its agents
unsolicited reports and invoices (Coldwell Banker v. Property I.D.); by Nutmeg
Insurance Company for declaratory relief (Nutmeg v. Property I.D.); and by a
real estate agent for PID's inaccurate flood determination on her property
(Blasko v. Kirk, et al).
    Copies of any of the lawsuits filed against Property I.D. by the U.S.
Department of Justice, Class Action plaintiffs, Realogy, Coldwell Banker, or
NDA, can be obtained at http://www.ndareports.com/legal-info.html
SOURCE  National Disclosure Authority

Maria Cordova of National Disclosure Authority, 1-866-918-1966

Isis Preservation website
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu YouTube channel
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu blog
Tiger Sanctuary Malibu Twitter

Isis Preservation, Irena Hauser, conditional use permit, cup, Ventura County Planning Department, Commission, hearing, tiger, sanctuary, malibu, 11077 pacific view, california, negative declaration, commissioner, michael wesner, stephen onstot, board of supervisors, ventura.org, isispreservation.com, tigersanctuarymalibu, paul magie, nora aidukas, richard rodriguez, w. stephen onstot, steve bennett, linda parks, kathy long, peter foy, john zaragoza, peter c foy, john c zaragoza, zoning, planning, public comment, lawsuit, sophia krszek, white tiger, russian, usda 93-c-0762, tujunga, fish, wildlife, permit, license, PL13-0011, exhibit, television, movies, film, trainer, experienced